Please contact us at (812) 855-0829 or email@example.com to obtain information contained in the documents below in an accessible format.
About Catapult Colloquium
The Catapult Center for Digital Humanities & Computational Analysis was established by the IU College of Arts and Sciences in 2012 for the promotion of the digital humanities and the computational and material analysis of texts. The goal of the Center was to build a visible community of scholars and researchers from the humanities, social sciences, computer and information sciences, and material sciences who wish to collaborate in seeking innovative solutions to problems that arise in textual and para-textual research. The Center hosted Colloquia 2012-2015.
This year (2016-2017), IDAH has expanded Catapult’s mission to encompass Digital Critique. Faculty and students from across the University are invited to join us in a year-long exploration of Diversity and Digital Culture. Our aim is to explore the way digital practices and everyday technology address, remediate, and reconfigure difference.
University of Hamburg
Monday, March 23, 2015
Annotation is a basic hermeneutical method in text-based humanities and beyond, which comes in very different shapes ranging from free-style comments to automatic annotation with standardized tagsets. While it is well established in corpus linguistics to use closed tagsets and to publish the annotated corpus together with its tagging guidelines for reuse by the research community, this is not the case in many other disciplines in Digital Humanities. In this talk, I argue in favor of establishing a general culture of creating reusable, annotated resources in a sustainable way. This includes small-scale studies of manual annotation, as well as the support of digging into big data by means of automatic annotation. A core feature in this endeavor is the Annotation Cycle that supports the process of deriving objective categories from subjective interpretation, which has its origins in machine learning approaches of computational linguistics.
Heike Zinsmeister is a professor for German linguistics and corpus linguistics at the University of Hamburg, Germany. After studying linguistics and philosophy in Stuttgart, Germany, she had worked in computational linguistics research projects for many years with a focus on linguistic annotation and its use. She is currently collaborating with DH researchers from literature and cultural anthropology exploring the merits of annotation.
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Monday, April 13, 2015
Digital archives and editions are some of the oldest and most useful digital humanities projects. The methods for creating these projects have been very successful, but they have also become “locked in”—that is, they have become so standard that it has become difficult to imagine alternatives, even alternatives that may speak directly to critical interests in texts. This talk will speculate about alternative digital presentations of literature by considering a case study, a New Historicist interest in the character Topsy from Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
Amanda Gailey is Assistant Professor of English at the University of Nebraska, where she teaches classes on digital humanities and American literature. She edits The Tar Baby and the Tomahawk, a digital collection of materials relating to the depiction of race in American children's literature, and she co-edits Scholarly Editing: The Annual of the Association for Documentary Editing, which publishes peer-reviewed digital editions of interesting literary and historical texts. Her book, Proofs of Genius: Collected Editions from the American Revolution to the Digital Age, will be released by the University of Michigan Press in October, 2015.
Piez Consulting Services
Monday, April 27, 2015
In 1816 Mary Shelley wrote a book that has become more than a classic, inscribing not only a text, but a troubling idea, indelibly into world consciousness.
Now we have computationally tractable forms of text, it is possible to examine this novel directly, not only searching and formatting it, but also subjecting it to more peculiar interrogations: laying out the body on the table and seeing what it is made of and how put together.
A great number and variety of interesting questions come up when we do this, relating not only to this text but to the modeling, description and representation of literary texts in general, and how current text encoding technologies serve to do this (or can be made to do so better). How is a dead text brought to life? What makes a text alive or dead in the first place?
It may be that (among other things) a living text shows an organic whole, an integrity of purpose in its various dimensions, layers and component parts. This is certainly the case with Shelley's Frankenstein, which proves under close examination to have a structure that is not fully understood or appreciated, even by many editors and publishers.
The audience is invited to bring printed or electronic copies of Mary Shelley's novel, in any edition. Our first question will be: where is the end of Chapter 24?
Wendell Piez is an independent consultant specializing in electronic publishing technologies, including XML and XSLT, whose PhD in English (Rutgers 1991) focused on Romantic and Victorian literature. His ongoing projects include LMNL (the Layered Markup and Annotation Language), a form of markup (not XML!) that is useful for representing overlapping phenomena in text. Wendell is also the General Editor for Digital Humanities Quarterly, published by the Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations.
Washington State University
Monday, October 20, 2014
Scholars tend to consider the digital humanities as a methodological field. But the changes occurring to culture due to digital technology also have the potential to impact the content of humanistic study. I'll examine steampunk as a subculture whose combination of experiments with alternate history, nineteenth-century writing, and the engineering of anachronistic devices all contribute to a bold vision of a historically-inflected digital humanities practice.
In addition to showing how steampunk authors respond to the use of nineteenth-century technological design in countries like India and China and the looming reality of climate change transforming our technological infrastructure, I will detail my own experiments with anachronistic computing as a response to Kari Kraus's call for more conjectural inquiry in the digital humanities. Steampunk is unique in its ability to appropriate nineteenth century history in order to find alternatives to the futurism that runs rampant in our neoliberal technology industry. This talk will show how a similar futurism can be found in some parts of the digital humanities, while detailing how nineteenth-century digital humanities can inspire alternatives to the future.
School of Cinematic Arts, University of Southern California
Thursday, October 16, 2014
Cultural analytics, a newer branch of the digital humanities, is an approach that deploys computer technologies to analyze the formal features of art and culture, making them available to interpretive methods. Moving image media is particularly ripe for computational analysis given its increasing ubiquity in contemporary culture. Indeed, digital video—whether recorded digitally or digitized from film—is a rapidly expanding form of contemporary cultural production, one made possible by the proliferation of personal recording technologies and hosting platforms like YouTube, Vimeo and the Internet Archive. In short, video is one of the most compelling “big data,” issues of the current cultural moment; its formats are diverse, rapidly transmitted, and boundlessly large in number.
Yet despite its scale and importance, video remains a daunting object for sustained research, for obstacles that are technological, institutional and conceptual in nature. In this talk, Virginia Kuhn will describe her large-scale video analytics project which is supported by the NSF’s XSEDE program (extreme science and engineering discovery environment) and her project team’s efforts at establishing a software workbench for video analysis, annotation, and visualization, using both current and experimental discovery methods.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Monday, April 7, 2014
To the extent that humanists discuss computer science at all, we tend to imagine it instrumentally, as a source of useful "tools." But the conversation between computer scientists and humanists needn't be purely instrumental. Computer science is an epistemologically flexible discourse that seeks to model learning and belief; humanists may have more in common with it than we imagine.
To make these abstract reflections more concrete I'll describe a research project that tries to understand the history of poetic diction from 1700 to 1920. In this project, I've found computers useful for practical reasons: confronted with hundreds of thousands of digitized books, we need a way to identify the particular volumes and pages that contain "poetry," and a way to identify historically significant trends in hundreds of thousands of works. But beyond those practical problems, I've found the conceptual resources of computer science helpful as I grapple with the necessary ambiguities surrounding critical terms like "genre" and "diction." Methods discussed will include multi-label classification, semi-supervised learning, and probabilistic graphical models as well as versification and close reading.
George Mason University
Monday, March 31, 2014
Digital media have profoundly changed the ways that our students find, make sense of, and work with historical information. In this talk, Professor Kelly will discuss his research on teaching and learning history with digital means, with a particular focus on how students are using digital tools to work with massive data sets and how they are using new media to stretch the boundaries of traditional forms of learning.
University of Oxford
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
Building on two large existing corpora of Old French (the Base de Français Médiéval (BFM) and the Nouveau Corpus d'Amsterdam (NCA)), the SRCMF project has created the first dependency treebank for Old French. This talk will consider the preparation of the corpus, and will go on to highlight some of the work that the corpus has made possible in the two years since the end of the project. The manual annotation of the corpus according to an innovative grammar model was made possible by the NotaBene annotation tool (Mazziotta 2010), and the quality of the annotation was ensured by a process of double blind annotation and subsequent comparison. The annotated texts are available (i) in Tiger-XML format, most helpful for conventional linguistic queries, and (ii) in CoNLL format for use in training the mate tools parser (Bohnet 2010). I will present ongoing work on constructing a web interface for the completed corpus using the TXM platform (Heiden 2010) which is used to host the (BFM), and will demonstrate the export of query results in the form of "Key Node in Context" concordances.
Department of Informatics
Monday, March 3, 2014
In August, 2013 the Virtual World Heritage Laboratory moved to IU from the University of Virginia. In this talk lab director Bernard Frischer will discuss recent projects of the lab including the Virtual Meridian of Augustus, the Digital Hadrian's Villa Project, and the Digital Sculpture Project. Frischer will also present the new online, peer-reviewed journal he founded, *Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, *the first scholarly outlet focusing on 3D modeling of cultural heritage artifacts, monuments, and settlements.
Idaho State University
Monday, March 3, 2014
3D technologies are revolutionizing the research experience by bringing critical, rare, fragile, or inaccessible collections to a world-wide audience. Coupled with on-screen analytical tools, the virtualization of entire repositories is democratizing the research enterprise by creating opportunities for students, indigenous peoples, politicians, and a global research community to conduct analyses from anywhere on the planet. The Idaho Museum of Natural History is at the forefront of virtualizing collections with over 15,000 archaeological and paleontological specimens on line, with key visualization and analytical tools built into the user experience. This presentation will provide a complete demonstration of this new model for the creation of global heritage repositories.
Blaise Agüera y Arcas
Monday, February 10, 2014 & Monday, February 10, 2014
With rare exceptions, women have been an economic underclass relative to men for thousands of years— perhaps since the dawn of agriculture. While we have made strides in recent history toward equal rights for the genders, it is still the case that the great majority of world capital remains in the hands of men; that a 50 year old American woman with full-time employment in 1970 made on average only 55% of a man’s wage; that today’s business executives and tech industry are overwhelmingly male-dominated. However, in this talk it will be argued that over the next few years we will see a reversal of this very longstanding status quo: women will become economically dominant. The case for this is argued using labor and wealth statistics, both American and international. The second half of the talk is more speculative, and delves into some theories as to why we are seeing this reversal now.
Blaise Agüera y Arcas
Monday, February 10, 2014 & Monday, February 10, 2014
Johann Gutenberg is widely understood to have been the inventor of the most important information technology of the second millennium: printing. Before Gutenberg, literacy in Europe was for the rich and noble, and books were individually hand-copied treasures. After his invention and its rapid spread throughout the continent, books and letters became widely accessible, leading to the rise of an educated middle class, a profound acceleration in technological innovation, the Protestant Reformation, and much else that shaped world history from 1500 on.
But how much do we know about what Gutenberg's invention actually was? Prior to the fruitful collaboration ten years ago between Blaise Agüera y Arcas, an applied math grad student at Princeton at the time, and Paul Needham, a world authority on Gutenberg and the curator of the Scheide Library at Princeton, much of what was known about Gutenberg's life and work came from secondary sources, legal records, and guesswork-- and much of it was in error. Needham and Agüera y Arcas worked together to apply modern analytic methods to Gutenberg's surviving output, using high resolution imaging and shape clustering to prove that while he was indeed a great inventor, he did not invent the technologies that have been ascribed to him, and that the early evolution of printing technology was much more complex than had been thought.
This talk will be of interest to humanists and scientists alike.
Monday, January 27, 2014
The use of the network as an object for representing and measuring systems has grown in the humanities and continues to increase in popularity but as it does there are more and more signs of the use of networks in simulation and modeling to explore humanities subjects. Building on Moretti's concept of operationalization, this talk will focus on the use of networks and network models not merely to describe systems but to hypothesize their formation, reproduction, maintenance and decline. This will include an exploration of the general principles of network analysis and representation as well as the use of networks in establishing system-based and agent-based models. These objects are dynamic, and as such interactive methods of publication are necessary to allow readers to interrogate, cite, critique or extend them. Some examples of these publication methods will be explored in depth, utilizing models from the work being done in the English and Classics departments at Stanford.
Steven E. Jones
Loyola University Chicago
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
The past decade has seen a profound shift in our collective understanding of the digital network. What was once understood to be a transcendent virtual reality is now experienced as a ubiquitous grid of data that we move through every day. As William Gibson says, cyberspace has everted, turned inside out and spilled out into the world. At the same time, the digital humanities has emerged as a new interdisciplinary field. This is no coincidence, as Jones argues in his new book, The Emergence of the Digital Humanities (Routledge, 2013). The eversion of cyberspace--as manifested in 3D printing, ubiquitous computing, data mining and analysis, the geospatial turn, and experiments with digital publishing platforms--provides an essential context for understanding the emergence and influence of the digital humanities in the new millennium.
University of Victoria
Monday, October 28, 2013
Janelle Jenstad will take you on a tour of early modern London via the four interoperable projects that make up The Map of Early Modern London. Taking the Agas map of 1560s London as its landscape, MoEML connects an encyclopedia of its people and places with an anthology of London's literature and a versioned edition of John Stow's Survey of London. The MoEML team works with an network of contributors in Digital Humanities and early modernists in various disciplines to map out relationships of proximity and visualize social and material relationships in the early modern city.
Bio: Janelle Jenstad is Associate Professor of English at the University of Victoria. She is the founder and current Director of The Map of Early Modern London, as well as the Assistant Coordinating Editor of the Internet Shakespeare Editions.
Friday, October 11, 2013
The field of "Digital Humanities" has expanded considerably in the past few years and continues to grow. Dedicated programmes and funding schemes led to both an increase in the availability of data through large-scale digitisation projects (e.g. historical newspapers, archaeological field books, mediaeval manuscripts) and a boost in basic research in this area. Several universities have set up research centers dedicated to digital humanities research. Furthermore the growing demand for researchers who combine deep knowledge of the humanities with IT-skills led to the establishment of many new degree programmes in digital humanities and related areas. However, the Digital Humanities are a very heterogeneous field, with different sub-communities which have very different views of what "Digital Humanities" should entail. Moreover, there continues to be a certain amount of skepticism towards the use of digital techniques in the Humanities themselves.
In this talk, I will present my view of the field and of its chances and challenges. I will present several case studies, ranging from digitally assisted curation in cultural heritage institutes, over digital research tools for humanities researchers (virtual research environments, digital editions, search interfaces) to methods for visualising and mining data and for extracting and quantifying information. It is this last area that has the biggest potential for changing humanities research by enabling researchers to discover facts that could not be discovered by traditional, purely manual means. However, this last area is also the most controversial and poses the biggest challenge, often requiring the development of novel, quantitative research methodologies in the Humanities. Clearly, these new methods should complement rather than substitute traditional methods.
Friday, September 20, 2013
William J. Turkel
University of Western Ontario
Friday, April 26, 2013
The idea that "making is thinking," as Richard Sennett puts it, has always had some place in the humanities. Until recently, however, it was costly and difficult to produce physical objects. Now online maker communities, powerful design software, cloud-based services, desktop fabrication and physical computing make it almost as easy for people to make and share artifacts as information or software. I describe how to set up a makerspace and fab lab for humanists, and why you might want to. http://williamjturkel.net/2013/02/02/the-history-department-with-a-fab-lab/
Friday, March 22, 2013
The main goal of this research program is to develop and evaluate practices, frameworks, and tools for the design and construction of worldwide distributed digital music archives and libraries. Over the last few millennia, humans have amassed an enormous amount of information and cultural material that is scattered around the world. It is becoming abundantly clear that the optimal path for acquisition is to distribute the task of digitizing the wealth of historical and cultural heritage material that exists in analogue formats, which may include books, manuscripts, music scores, maps, photographs, videos, analogue tapes, and phonograph records. In order to achieve this goal, libraries, museums, and archives throughout the world, large or small, need well-researched policies, proper guidance, and efficient tools to digitize their collections and to make them available economically. The research conducted within the program will address unique and imminent challenges posed by the digitization and dissemination of music media. In this talk various projects currently conducted at our laboratory will be presented; including optical music recognition, workflow management for automatic metadata extraction of LP recordings, creation of ground truth for music structural and chord analysis, and evaluation of digitization methods for analogue recordings.
Computational methods and perspectives can transform the history of science by enabling the pursuit of novel types of questions, expanding dramatically the scale of analysis (geographically and temporally) and offering novel forms of publication that greatly enhance access and transparency. In this talk we present a brief summary of a computational research system for the history of science, introduce some of the tools and use cases, discuss its implications for research, education and publication practices and its connections to the open access movement and similar transformations in the natural and social sciences emphasizing big data. One of the connections of this approach is with genomics and we will explore the isomorphic structure between different types of historically evolving information systems, such as genomes and science. We also argue that computational approaches help to reconnect the history of science to individual scientific disciplines.
University of Nebraska
Friday, February 8, 2013
How do literary expressions of and attitudes toward slavery in the 19th century change according to fictional setting? Do novels set in Ireland present a perspective toward landlords and tenants that is similar or different from what we find in novels set in America or England? How do the answers to these and similar questions fluctuate over time or according to author gender or author nationality?
This study uses tools and techniques from text mining, natural language processing, machine learning, and statistics to address questions such as these and to identify and study how specific places, themes, and sentiments find synchronous or asynchronous expression within the 19th century literary imagination. Using data mined from a large corpus, ~3500 works of British, Irish and American fiction, this macroanalysis seeks to expose persistent links between geographic setting, theme, and sentiment and to then chart the ways in which places (such as Ireland) are constructed, or “invented,” within the literary imagination of the century.
Timothy R. Tangherlini
Friday, January 25, 2013
With the advent of the very large digital repositories of literary and other culturally expressive works, canonical approaches to Humanities research are confronted with a crisis of sustainability. If we have access to all the literature produced in the 19th century, should we not take it into account in some way in our research? Similarly, if we have access to several hundred thousand stories in our folklore archives, should we not devise methods that allow for all of that information to inform our research? Several fundamental challenges exist for Humanities scholars as we move toward considering these larger and larger corpora, not least of which is how one “reads” fifteen thousand novels, or a quarter of a million stories? In this presentation, I explore the theoretically tantalizing prospect of a research environment that Katy Börner has labeled the “macroscope.” For Börner, “Macroscopes provide a ‘vision of the whole,’ helping us ‘synthesize’ the related elements and detect patterns, trends, and outliers while granting access to myriad details. Rather than make things larger or smaller, macroscopes let us observe what is at once too great, slow, or complex for the human eye and mind to notice and comprehend” (Börner 2011, 60). The macroscope holds the promise of wedding “close reading” approaches, which have been a fundamental analytical approach in folkloristics since the beginning of the field, to what Franco Moretti has called “Distant Reading” where “Distance… is a condition of knowledge: it allows you to focus on units that are much smaller or much larger than the text: devices, themes, tropes—or genres and systems” (Moretti 2000, 57). In this presentation, I make use of work on a large corpus of Danish folklore, the Google Books corpus, and other preliminary explorations on internet data, from blogs, to twitter, to Facebook and YouTube. I present some possible algorithmic approaches to specific research problems, including network methods and topic modeling.
University of Sussex
Friday, November 30, 2012
Since Newton's non-scientific papers were sold at auction in 1936, there has been a progressive revelation of information about the little known private mental life of Isaac Newton. Although his writings on alchemical and religious topics were effectively available on microfilm by the mid-1980s, the online publication of all of his writings dramatically improves our ability to investigate this unknown world. In this talk I examine how the digital medium -- coupled with hard scholarly work -- has facilitated the acquisition of new insights into the development of Newton's beliefs and research practices. I conclude by considering some of the wider implications for humanities research that arise from creating and engaging with the online Newton.
Max Planck Institute for the History of Science
Monday, October 22, 2012
Since the foundation of the Max Planck Institute of the History of Science in 1994, it is our primary concern to make source materials available in digital form together with developing cutting edge tools and instruments to adequately support the scholarly work. ECHO - Cultural Heritage Online as an open access repository and research environment is the most prominent outcome of this endeavor. Based on our experience, basic issues of motivation, collection building strategies, specific tool development, Open Access as primary prerequisite (Berlin Declaration), research collaboration and trans-disciplinarity will be raised. Reflecting on changing notions of "the document" and on information economy, novel ways of disseminating research results will be presented (e.g. by way of Virtual Spaces; with Edition Open Access). Finally, problems of organizing quality control, of long-term sustainability, and of gaining recognition in evaluation procedures will be discussed.